b. 195
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The missing slur and dots in FE (→GE) must be an oversight by the engraver; he also overlooked a slur in the previous bar. The markings were added by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 195-205
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In the main text we add slurs to the staccato dots with which the pairs of L.H. crotchets are marked in these bars (Chopin wrote such slurs only in the 2nd halves of b. 196, 198 and 200). We provide an extensive justification of this decision in the note concerning b. 9-21. As was the case there, slurs were added here also by EE3 (except for the 2nd half of b. 199). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 195-197
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A one can see deleted slurs over the pairs of D crotchets in the 1st halves of b. 195 and 197. According to us, it does not mean that the articulation of those crotchets is to be different from the preceding similar pairs in b. 194 and 196. The removal of the slurs was aimed at maintaining a consistent notation of the entire section (b. 194-205), compliant with the notation applied in b. 9-21, in which the L.H. part slurs are put only where the accompanying pairs of crotchets, provided with slurs, are absent in the R.H. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Deletions in A |
||||||||
b. 195-200
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The slurs added by EE (in the L.H. part) over the d1-c1 motifs in b. 195-196 and the d1-e1 motifs in b. 199-200 were arbitrarily added during the revision of EE, what is more, inconsistently – slurs were not added in b. 201-205. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 195
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
There are two versions in AsI – the earlier one, written in normal-sized notes, which we consider to be the text of this source, and the later one, marked with additional small notes. This second version, almost identical to the one added in AsI in bar 179, can be considered a first attempt at the final version appearing in other sources. The notation of the second version is not univocal:
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes , Main-line changes , Corrections of AI |