|
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The slur of GE1 (→FE→EE), contrary to the unquestionable notation of A, probably stems from a misunderstanding of the notation of A in the previous bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 196-198
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Out of the two digits visible in FEH in analogous places in bars 196 and 198, in the main text we include only the first one, written probably by Chopin. This entry confirms Fontana's fingering, at least in its part from the 3rd to the 6th semiquaver in bar 196. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
There are three natural ways to add the rhythmic value in which the notation of FE is lacking; we give them as potentially compliant with Chopin's intention. Two of them were implemented already in the first editions. In the main text, we give the rhythm adopted in GE, which, according to us, is most likely due to the calming of the course of music (rallentando in the next bar) and due to the presence of that very rhythm in an analogous context in bar 440. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
before f2.
