|
b. 145-146
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The overlooked staccato dots over G in bar 145 and A category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 145
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The too early placed category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 145-160
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the entire section, Chopin wrote only one slur in the part of the L.H. in A, in bar 146. The fact that he then resigned from repeating the slurs written in the R.H. is proved by the notation of bar 160, opening a new page in A: in the part of the L.H. one can see there a deletion of a slur reaching the a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 145-146
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we give the interpretation of the curved line of FE (→GE1→GE2) adopted in EE and GE3. The Chopinesque manner of writing ties as short curved lines reaching the prolonging note would frequently result in their erroneous interpretation. However, other possibilities cannot be excluded – the curved line in the autograph could have been led over the top voice, since moving slurs to the side of note heads was a routine procedure, frequently applied by engravers. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 145-146
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Due to a possible misunderstanding of the Chopinesque tie sustaining f1, in some sources the note is repeated – see the previous note. category imprint: Differences between sources |
in bar 146 are certainly a mistake of 
before 5th quaver in 
