



b. 145
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur in the 2nd half of the bar, added in GE2 and EE is certainly arbitrary, although the analogy with the 1st half of the bar certainly encourages an addition. However, it is puzzling that the reviser of EE added a slur from the 2nd quaver, although in the 1st half of the bar EE has a slur from the 1st quaver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 145
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
None of the sources includes the correct notation of accidentals, although omissions do not impede the interpretation. In A there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 145
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 145-146
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 145
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The earlier division of the slur in the editions is certainly a result of distraction of the engraver of GE1, who, seeing a similarly shaped group of four notes, gave a third consecutive four-note slur. The slurs probably indicate here the following rhythmic grouping of this 18-note figure: 4-4-5-5. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |