b. 189
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
c1 as the last quaver in the bar is almost certainly a mistake of GE. There is no reason to change the characteristic signal motif recalled here. While inserting this note, the engraver could have confused this bar with the next one. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 189
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the version of GE, in which the performance indications are most accurate (slur, staccato dot and hairpin in b. 189-191). According to us, the omission of the g quaver is to be considered a continuation of the changes, which are evidenced by crossings-out and corrections visible in AI in b. 185-189. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accompaniment changes , Main-line changes |
||||||||
b. 189-191
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The pedalling markings are almost certainly an improvement introduced by Chopin in [AG] (→GE1). The absence of the marks in GE2 is probably a result of the engraver's oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 189
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The staccato dot is probably a clarification introduced into [AG] (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
b. 189
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE , Revisions in FESB |