b. 167
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The cautionary naturals before g2 and g1 were added in GE (→FE→EE). It could have been performed at Chopin's request. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||
b. 167-168
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Beginning a slur from the second note of the bassoon motif is certainly an inaccuracy of GE1, repeated in all subsequent editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
b. 167
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Differently than in analogous bars 161-166 and 168, in GE both slurs begin from the 2nd quaver in the group. It is almost certainly a result of proofreading – probably a Chopin one – since the slurs of A, particularly the second one, are exceptionally inaccurate here. The difference in slurring was not included in FE (→EE), which may be explained by distraction or a unifying revision. It is also possible that the slurs in GE1 were changed in the last phase of proofreading, already after the copies had been sent to Paris. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 167-168
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A, Chopin did not specify – consciously or not – the moment of pedal release. We suggest two possible pedalling solutions for this place in the main text. No sign must be an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , No pedal release mark |
|||||
b. 167
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In EE, the long accent was reproduced as a short one. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions |