|
b. 133
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In EE1, there is no ending of the slur on a new line. The mistake was corrected already by the reviser of EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||||
|
b. 133-137
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Precise slurring of this section (bars 128-143) is a result of Chopin's proofreading, whose traces are visible in FE in bars 133, 136 and 137 – the original slurs reached only just the fourth last semiquaver. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
|
b. 133
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
FED repeated here the Chopinesque fingering from identical bar 129. Since the entry does not provide new information, we do not give it in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 133-136
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The shortened slurs and accents of EE, as well as the wedge over the 1st sixth in b. 135, are unjustified revisions of this edition (analogous additions were introduced in b. 136-137 too). Chopin confirmed the performance manner of these motifs (written down in FE (→GE)) in analogous b. 141-142 and 143-144 (and partially also 142-143 and 144-145), in which, after all, EE did not change the slurs. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 133
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The missing staccato dot in GE is probably an oversight. An intentional omission of the mark, which could have been considered a mistake in the face of the absence of respective markings in the next, analogous bars, seems to be less likely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
