|
b. 108-111
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
The pedalling, present only in FE, could have been added by Chopin in the proofreading of this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slur over the L.H. part, if not overlooked by the engraver of FE (→EE1), could have been added in GC (→GE) by Chopin. The sign was then added in EE2. Similarly in bar 116. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||
|
b. 108-109
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
It is not certain whether the slur was added by Chopin in GC or overlooked in FE1 (→FE2). Anyways, the Chopinesque proofreading of FE3 (→FE4) and of the base text to EE does not leave any doubts concerning Chopin's intention. Cf. bars 109-110. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
|||||
|
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 108-109
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we take into account the tie of the d1 note, written in GC (→GE) and probably overlooked in FE (→EE1). The tie was added in EE2 too. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
is an arbitrary addition of the reviser of 
