b. 133-135
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||||
b. 133-136
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the differences in the marked range of the cresc. - - - indication are of a random character. In particular, the absence of dashes in bar 136 could have resulted in FE from difficulties in a legible distribution of all elements of the notation of [A] (cf. the notation of GC) or in FE itself, whereas according to Chopin's intention, crescendo was supposed to be valid most probably until in bar 137. Therefore, in the main text we suggest leading the dashes to the end of bar 136 (see also bars 127-128). The total absence of dashes in GE1 is certainly a mistake (cf. the note on the hairpin in bars 135-136). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 133-135
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||
b. 133-150
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Over the pair of minims in bars 133-134 and 149-150 in the main text we give the slurs written in A. We consider a possible proofreading of Chopin in FE (→EE) to be only an ad hoc intervention, correcting the misleading reproduction of these slurs (preserved in the majority of GE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||
b. 133-134
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The lack of the hairpin in the majority of GE is probably a result of an oversight of the engraver of FE, which was then corrected in the very FE (→EE). The sign was added in GE2no2 too. We reproduce the range of the sign on the basis of the notation of A. Cf. bars 3-4. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |