b. 130
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The dynamic markings in this tutti differ from the majority of the remaining ones, particularly in the discussed bar, in the 2nd half of which there is a short diminuendo (), absent in all analogous bars. However, such a hairpin is present in similar motifs in b. 96, 200 and 240, always preceded by a mark. Due to the above, in the main text we suggest adding such a crescendo. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 130
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
We add a cautionary before b1 in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 130-132
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In this chromatic progression, the notation of the sources does not contain any mistakes, and Chopin took care of a few cautionary accidentals – to g1-b1 at the beginning of bar 130, to g1 in bar 131 and to d1-f1 in bar 132. In the main text we also add naturals to e in bar 130 and to B and a in bar 132. The latter were also added by GE (a to B) and EE (a to a). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||
b. 130-131
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The division of the slur in FC falls on such unnatural place that one could assume a misunderstanding in the reading of [A], e.g. caused by the transition into a new line in the autograph. Due to the above, in the main text we give the slur of FE, more reliable in this context. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||
b. 131-132
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In GE the the second and third notes of b. 131 in RH are connected by an additional slur. The same applies to bars 131 and 132. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |