|
b. 106-108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Like in the 1st half of bar 106 and 108, the fingering in FES, most probably Chopinesque, is very difficult to decipher. According to the General Editorial Principles, p. 17, in the main text we give the digits, complementing each other, written in both bars already in the first (bar 106). The differing fingering of FEH may be considered an authentic alternative. Fontana's fingering in EE is fully compliant with the entry in FES and essentially also with FED. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 106-108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, in bar 106 we give a fingering based on the complementary entries in FES in bar 106 and 108 – cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 17. It is characterised by regular changes of hand position – the 1st finger falls on e2 both in the ascending and descending parts of the passage. The digits written in those bars in FEH describe a different fingering, in which in the ascending part of the passage the 1st finger falls on b1, which, at the expense of a broader hand position – b1-c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 106-108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 106-108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 106
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
Both the missing accent in EE1 and its placement on the 3rd semiquaver of the bar in GE1 (→GE2) must be mistakes. The oversight of the accent in EE1 could have been repeated after FE, in which the mark was then added in the last phase of proofreading. The addition of the accent in EE2 in an erroneous place may mean that the reviser did not compare this bar with b. 62, but with GE1 (there is also a possibility that it is simply a mistake, e.g. of the engraver). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
3 – allows for a slightly easier change of position.
