Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 131

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

..

FE (→GE1) overlooked the staccato dot on the 1st beat of the R.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 131

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

Minim & semibreve in GC (→GE)

No inner notes in FE1

Minims in FE2 (→EE,FE3FE4)

..

In the main text we give the undoubtedly correct rhythmic notation of the middle notes of the chord, transmitted by GC (→GE). Among the remaining versions, the first is erroneous, whereas the second – inaccurate (probably due to a misunderstanding of the notation of [A]). 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Different values of chord components , FE revisions

b. 131

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

..

There is no  before the top note of the last octave in the L.H. – undoubtedly a g – in GC and FE (→EE1). This patent inaccuracy was revised in GE and EE2, however, in GE the  was misplaced in front of in the R.H. (in the sources the bottom notes of the last two octaves in the R.H. are written on the bottom stave).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in GC

b. 131

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

f in GE, possible interpretation of GC & FE1 (→FE2FE3,EE1)

e in FE4 & EE2

..

GC and the previous impressions of FE (→EE) include the erroneous as the top bottom note in the chord on the 2nd crotchet. The mistake was revised in GE, adding a  before this note, which has to be considered to be justified. However, the comparison with analogous bar 171, and, above all, the change introduced – probably by Chopin – in FE4 convinces that the mistake concerned the pitch and not the missing . The version with e was introduced also in EE2, most probably on the basis of FE4. According to us, both here and in the previous bar, we are dealing with Chopin's mistakes in [A].

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC

b. 131-147

composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

..

In the main text we add a cautionary  before fin bars 131 and 147. The signs were added already in #GE3no2 and GE3op.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions