|
Long accent on d2 in FE |
|
|
Long accent on e2 in GE1 |
|
|
No mark in EE1 |
|
|
Vertical accent on e2 in EE2 |
|
|
Short accent on e2 in GE2 |
|
|
Short accent on d2 in GE3 |
Both the missing accent in EE1 and its placement on the 3rd semiquaver of the bar in GE1 (→GE2) must be mistakes. The oversight of the accent in EE1 could have been repeated after FE, in which the mark was then added in the last phase of proofreading. The addition of the accent in EE2 in an erroneous place may mean that the reviser did not compare this bar with b. 62, but with GE1 (there is also a possibility that it is simply a mistake, e.g. of the engraver).
In the editions that feature an accent here, it was the same type of mark as previously that was used: see b. 99-105.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Long accents, EE revisions, Errors in EE, Errors in GE, GE revisions
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins