mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 105

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

before 3rd quaver in FE (→EE)

on 3rd quaver in GE
..

In GE, the  mark was placed under the 3rd quaver. It is a minor inaccuracy of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 105-107

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Fingering written into FEJ

No teaching fingering
..

In the main text, we give 3 digits of the Chopinesque fingering written in pencil to FEJ in bars 105 and 107.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEJ

b. 105-107

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No signs in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Slurs in GE3
..

In GE3, slurs over the three-note motifs in the top voice of the R.H. and the L.H. were arbitrarily added in bars 105 and 107 (three subsequent semiquavers in the R.H. were provided with staccato dots).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 105-107

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No marks in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Staccato dots in GE3
..

As part of an arbitrary clarification of articulation, GE3 provided the repeated semiquavers in bars 105 and 107 with staccato marks.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 105

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

..

The indications of triplets are our addition.

category imprint: Editorial revisions