mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 105

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

No marking in FE & EE

in GE

Our variant suggestion
..

Chopin added the  indication in FEG (→GE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of GE

b. 105

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

..

In FEG Chopin wrote the leggiero indication over the R.H. part. It is similarly placed also in FE and EE. However, in GE the indication was placed between the staves, contrary to Chopin's inscription in FEG.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Placement of markings

b. 105

composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor

a in chord in FC (→GE) & EE

f in FE
..

Same as in analogous bar 8, while proofreading FE, Chopin changed the middle note of the last chord in the L.H. from a to f.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 105

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

No arpeggio sign in GC (→GE)

Arpeggio sign in FE (→EE)
..

The arpeggio was most probably overlooked by the copyist.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 105-107

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

Single slurs in GC & FE (→EE)

Double slurs in GE
..

The slurs under the notes in GE are certainly an arbitrary addition of the editor.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions