b. 129-130
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Staccato dots above the five octaves in the R.H. are found only in GC (→GE; #Wn2 also has dots below the L.H octaves). EE does not have any markings in that fragment. FE has a slur running from the 2nd octave of bar 129 up to the beginning of bar 143. For that reason, variants of performance markings are included in the note to bars 129-139. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 129
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Both versions of the rhythm in this bar are probably authentic. Identical differences in rhythm between those sources also occur in analogous bars 47 and 389. As the main text we give the version of FE, perhaps the latest. The same version was also introduced in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inserted rest |
|||||||
b. 129
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In the main text, we include a cautionery before d1 in the L.H., written by Chopin into GC (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||
b. 129
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The topmost component of the chord in the R.H. was written in GC as a1. This mistake was repeated in GE1; it was corrected only in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Errors of GC |
|||||||
b. 129
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
Leaving the staccato dots in FE (→EE) is, according to us, a result of an inaccurately performed proofreading, whose aim was – same as in analogous bar 25 – to replace dots with accents. The dots were not included in GE, probably after comparison with bar 25. The absence of the accent in the R.H. is certainly an oversight of GE3 (→GE4). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |