b. 125-127
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI the following quavers: g3 in b. 125, c4 and e4 in b. 126 and b2, e2 and d2 in the 1st volta of b. 127 are written as crotchets – they lack quaver flags. The first two of those mistakes (next to g3 and c4) were repeated in A. The editions contain the right text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
|||||||
b. 125
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The differing performance markings of FC and FE were independently introduced by Chopin both in the copy and in the stage of proofreading FE (or in the basis for it) – see the note on the filiation of the Mazurkas. In the main text we give the version of the principal source (FC), but the second version may be regarded as an equal option. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||
b. 125
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||
b. 125-127
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
Assigning the accents to the R.H. part must be a mistake by the engraver of GE. Although the version of PE is not clear from the graphical point of view, the natural addressee of these accents are the distinct L.H. minims resulting from syncopation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in PE |
|||||||
b. 125
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
In PE1 (→PE2) there is no lowering f2 to f2. The patent mistake was corrected in GE. A natural to this note was also added in PE3 (→PE4); however, it was placed on the wrong side of the note – right. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Sign reversal , Errors in PE , |