|
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
Chopin's wedge from A was rendered in GE1 as a dot, which was repeated by FE (→EE). Moreover, GE2 (→GE3) have another dot in the L.H. We base our main text on A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The accent that falls on the 3rd beat in A (→GE) was omitted from FE (→EE), probably accidentally left out by the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
We add a staccato dot over the 2nd crotchet of the bar, by analogy with bar 42, in which the appropriate mark does appear, possibly added by Chopin himself. The dot was also added in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The long accent written by Chopin in A was reversed in GE1 (→FE) so that it resembles small crescendo hairpins. In EE that reversed mark, difficult to understand in the context, was omitted altogether. GE2 introduced a short accent, yet assigned it to the sixth in the L.H. That latter inaccuracy was corrected in GE3 category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Sign reversal |
