Ornaments
b. 56-60
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In GE the trills in b. 56 and 60 are written without a wavy line after . In the main text we follow the more suggestive notation of FE (→EE) in b. 56. The missing wavy line in b. 60 is almost certainly a mistake by the engraver of FE, since in b. 293, which is a non-written-out repetition of b. 60 in the manuscripts, the wavy line was actually printed. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As was the case with analogous b. 31, the slur of GE, although formally correct, is most probably inaccurate and marks a grace note and an arpeggio (written down as a vertical slur), as was conveyed in FE. The absence of a slur (arpeggio) in EE, whatever the reason, cannot be authentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in EE , Arpeggio – vertical slur |
||||||||
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we add an arpeggio mark after a comparison with analogous b. 33 as well as with b. 109. In the case of chords with such a span, Chopin most probably meant the marks placed in those bars before the first chord to apply to all the following ones in this and analogous bars. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the sources there is no over , which is a patent inaccuracy, most probably repeated after [A]. category imprint: Interpretations within context |
||||||||
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |