Ornaments
|
b. 70-72
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The trills in b. 70 and 72 were written in GE without a wavy line after category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 78
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
To the main text we adopt the notation of GE, based on [A]. Chopin would use both symbols interchangeably to mark a mordent; however, the version of FE may be regarded as a variant. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 105
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the arpeggio visible in GE. The missing arpeggio in FE (→EE) could be explained by an oversight of the copyist or of the engraver; it could also have been entered into [A] after [FC] had already been finished (→FE). category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 106-110
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The trills in bars 106 and 110 are printed in GE without wavy lines after the we write trills with full wavy lines, since there are no doubts that this is how the markings present in the sources are to be understood – see the note in b. 10. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 107
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As was the case with analogous b. 31 and 57, the slur of GE, although formally correct, is most probably inaccurate and marks a grace note and an arpeggio (written down as a vertical slur). The missing slur (arpeggio) in FE (→EE) is most probably an oversight by the copyist in [FC] or by the engraver. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Arpeggio – vertical slur |
in 
in 
