Ornaments
|
b. 207-208
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
There are no doubts that the version of GE2 is arbitrary, although it is difficult to say what could have induced the reviser to introduce this change – whether he considered the authentic notation to be wrong, suggesting an improper performance, or whether he considered the change to be of an ordering nature, with no influence on the performance (see the next note). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest an optional ornament like in b. 181. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 276
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in analogous b. 43 and 69, in the main text we include the arpeggio marked in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 277-279
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The trills in b. 277 and 279 are written down in GE without a wavy line after the category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 285
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 52 and 78, to the main text we adopt the notation of GE, based on [A]. Chopin would use both symbols interchangeably to mark a mordent; however, the version of FE may be regarded as a variant. category imprint: Differences between sources |
in 
in 
in 
