b. 293
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the sources there is no over the mark, which is a patent inaccuracy, certainly repeated after [A]. category imprint: Interpretations within context |
||||||
b. 293
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The additional trill in GE is most probably a mistake by the engraver, who placed a crotchet too early and either did not notice his mistake or forgot to remove the wrong mark. Anyways, the trill was absent in [A] – this bar was not written out in the manuscripts, but marked in an abridged manner as a repetition of b. 60, in which there is no trace of that trill. Moreover, there is no convincing evidence of Chopin proofreading GE1. Nevertheless, we have to admit that such a diversification of the last appearance of a repeated phrase would fit into the Chopinesque style. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 293-294
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 60-61, in the main text we give the shorter slur of GE; however, the version of FE (→EE) may be considered equal. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The version of FE (→EE), identical to the version of GE and analogous b. 61 in terms of sound, possibly originated as an ad hoc correction of the engraver's mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 294-295
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 61-64, in the main text we give the unequivocal slurs of FE (→EE). The slurs of GE1, starting earlier, may convey the inaccurate notation of [A], which most probably indicates slurs of the same range. The version of GE2 must be arbitrary. Our alternative suggestion is based on the assumption that the engravers could have routinely interpreted the endings of the slurs. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |