data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 322-323
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The sources differ in the range of the last R.H. phrase mark – in GE it reaches c category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 323-324
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The missing tie in FE (→EE) is probably an oversight of the engraver, although a deletion/omission of the slur in the Stichvorlage to FE cannot be ruled out. Therefore, it is difficult to safely say which version Chopin deemed final. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 325-326
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The absence of slurs in GE1 must be the engraver's oversight (four similar slurs in b. 323-325 are present in GE1). The mistake was corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |