|
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in analogous b. 61, in the main text we give the notation of GE, which is undoubtedly correct. In the suggested alternative version, the notation was brought into line with the authentic notation of subsequent bars, since there are no visible reasons to differentiate between the rhythmic values of the top and bottom notes of this octave. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 295
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As with the other similar bars, in FE (→EE) it is only the top note of the 1st R.H. octave that is separated as a crotchet, which is a mistake. To the main text we adopt the notation of GE, which is undoubtedly correct. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 295
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in analogous b. 36 and 62, we consider the missing dots prolonging the f category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 295
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In GE and FE1 there is no accidental to the bottom note of the L.H. chord on the 3rd beat of the bar (d). FE2 and EE added a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 296-309
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the pedal markings of GE, entered probably into [A] after [FC] had been finished. We discuss b. 298 and 304 separately, in which the markings are also absent in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
1-f
, which we include in the main text. This and other additions were also introduced in b. 
