|
b. 299
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The missing dot prolonging the bottom note of the octave, a2, despite the semblance of righteousness – in FE the bottom note is a quaver – is almost certainly an oversight. Wherever similarly written-down octaves (i.e. in two-part notation) are provided with dots, they are present next to both notes of an octave, irrespective of the notation of a given octave (one- or two-part). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 300
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 274, the majority of the sources lack the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 300
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
According to us, the version with d resulted from Chopin having overlooked the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 301
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary naturals to the D-d octave. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 301-302
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the manuscripts these bars were almost certainly marked in an abridged manner as a repetition of b. 68-70. It means that the slur present in [A] (→GE) in b. 68-69 should be in GE also in this place, yet it was overlooked by the engraver. As we adopted that slur to the main text the first time, we also suggest it here. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE |
restoring g
2 in the last octave in the bar. The mistake was corrected only in 
