data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 290
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 57, on the 3rd beat of the bar, in the main text we suggest supplementing the Chopinesque pedalling after analogous b. 31. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 290
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As was the case with analogous b. 31, the slur of GE, although formally correct, is most probably inaccurate and marks a grace note and an arpeggio (written down as a vertical slur), as was conveyed in FE. The absence of a slur (arpeggio) in EE, whatever the reason, cannot be authentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 290
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 291-292
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 58-59, in FE1 there is not a single category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 292
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 59, in the main text we add an arpeggio on the basis of a comparison with b. 33 and 109. category imprint: Editorial revisions |