Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 290

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No markings in sources

[ ] suggested by the editors

..

Like in b. 57, on the 3rd beat of the bar, in the main text we suggest supplementing the Chopinesque pedalling after analogous b. 31.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 290

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Slur in GE, literal reading

Arpeggio sign in GE (contextual interpretation) & FE

No sign in EE

..

As was the case with analogous b. 31, the slur of GE, although formally correct, is most probably inaccurate and marks a grace note and an arpeggio (written down as a vertical slur), as was conveyed in FE. The absence of a slur (arpeggio) in EE, whatever the reason, cannot be authentic.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 290

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

FE overlooked the dots prolonging the e-e1 octave. The mistake was corrected in EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 291-292

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

Like in b. 58-59, in FE1 there is not a single  raising g to g (in various octaves). The mistake was corrected in FE2 and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions

b. 292

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No mark in FE (→EE) & GE

Arpeggio sign suggested by editors

..

Like in b. 59, in the main text we add an arpeggio on the basis of a comparison with b. 33 and 109.

category imprint: Editorial revisions