



b. 223
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The pedalling of FE is most probably incomplete, hence in the main text we supplement it after analogous b. 221 (as well as 203). The missing markings in EE most probably resulted from an oversight, as in the two preceding bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , No pedal release mark |
||||||
b. 224-227
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the slurring of GE, in which the slurs are separated with rests in b. 224 and 226. Although one can often encounter slurs over rests in Chopin's output – cf., e.g. b. 217 or 240 – in this case it is much more likely that the continuous slur encompassing b. 220-227 in FE resulted from misinterpretation of the slurs of the handwritten basis (perhaps inaccurate or ambiguous). It particularly concerns b. 224 – cf. analogous b. 165 – in which the melody, not to mention the L.H. part, moves on to a higher register (from f category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 224-225
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary naturals to a1 and a2 in b. 224 and a category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
On the 2nd and 3rd beats of the bar one can see corrections of the bottom R.H. notes in AImaz the result of which is not entirely clear. The crotchet on the 2nd beat could be interpreted as d2-a2 or c category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Accompaniment changes |
||||||
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The missing dot next to the b minim in FE (→EE) is probably an oversight by the copyist or the engraver (cf. b. 166). However, the dot is also absent in AImaz, which, in case of an alternative filiation, may indicate that [A2] did not include a dot. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |