|
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the sources there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context |
||||||||
|
b. 60-61
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the shorter slur of GE, since there is no reason to differentiate between slurs here and in analogous b. 34-35, in which all sources contain a compliant version with the slur reaching only the end of the bar. However, the version of FE (→EE) may be considered equal, since the slur of [A] could have been inaccurate, e.g. it could have ended over the key signature of the new key, which resulted in different interpretations. Musically speaking, both slurs are justified due to the phrases having been combined at the beginning of b. 61. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The crotchets visible in the L.H. part at the beginning of b. 61 and 62 in FE1 resulted from the engraver having overlooked a quaver flag or beam. In FE2 and EE1 it was only b. 62 that was corrected, hence in that group of editions it is only EE2 (→EE3) that includes the correct text, compliant with GE1 and analogous b. 294-295. The quaver flag in b. 61 was overlooked in GE2 too. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As is the case with the remaining similar bars, in FE (→EE) it is only the top note of the 1st R.H. octave that is separated as a crotchet. It is almost certainly an inaccuracy; in the main text we give the notation of GE. The suggestion of an additional, alternative version of this place results from the failure to provide a justification for the differentiation between the rhythmic values of the bottom and top (tied) notes of that octave. According to us, it may be a remaining element of the corrections performed in [A] or in a still earlier draft autograph – Chopin could have e.g. started from an analogous version to b. 35, in which f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 61-64
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the unquestionable slurs of FE (→EE). The fact that the slurs of GE1 begin earlier can reflect the inaccurate notation of [A], which most probably marked slurs of the same range. The version of GE2 must be arbitrary. Our alternative suggestion is based on an assumption that the endings of the slurs could have been routinely revised by the engravers. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
over 
, which is a patent inaccuracy, most probably repeated after [A].
1-f
