



b. 375-376
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
A comparison with analogous bars (b. 273-274, 293-294 and 396-397) points to Chopin's mistake, almost certain. Therefore, in the main text we include the ties added in GE2 (→GE3). Both ties were added in FESf. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Errors of A |
||||
b. 375-396
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||
b. 376
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The dotted g category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Errors of FC |
||||
b. 376-398
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
We give the motivic slurs in b. 376-377 and 397-398 after the unquestionable notation of A (→FC→GE1). The version of FE (→EE), in which three out of four slurs were omitted (both in b. 376-377 and in the R.H. in b. 397-398), was a result of carelessness of the engraver of FE. The version of GE2 (→GE3) is an arbitrary revision, unifying the slurring of all analogous bars after the erroneous version of GE1 in b. 274-275. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||
b. 376-378
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In this case, the easiest explanation for the longer phrase mark of FC (→GE) is a mistake resulting from the change of division of the text into lines. The phrase mark in A reaches almost the end of the line, since b. 377, which ends it, is very tight. The copyist wrote an entire phrase in that line, until b. 378, and wrote a phrase mark whose range was similar to A, yet measured in relation to the end of the line. The ending of the tie of c category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FC |