|
b. 380-382
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary naturals before a in b. 380 and 382 and a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 382-383
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The interpretation of the phrase mark of A by FE (→EE) must be considered inaccurate: the phrase mark of the manuscript is pulled to the beginning of b. 383, while the bold ending of the slur proves a careful, diligent stroke of the pen. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
|
b. 382-383
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing slur for the L.H. is most probably an oversight of the engraver of FE. After all, it cannot be excluded that, looking at A, he regarded the L.H. slur as the beginning of the R.H. slur, which can be indicated by the original range of the R.H. slur in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
|
b. 383-386
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Notation with normal font notes is a result of a misunderstanding of A by the engraver of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
|
b. 383
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A it is unclear whether the phrase mark is to begin from the 1st or the 2nd note of the bar, which was reflected in the differing versions of FC and FE (→EE). At the same time, in FE there are visible traces of shortening the phrase mark, which initially reached b1 in the previous bar. The version of GE is probably a 'standard inaccuracy' resulting from a tendency to adjust phrase marks (and dynamic hairpins) to regular rhythmic structures, e.g. bars, which is documented in a number of Chopin's pieces. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , Authentic corrections of FE |
before g
in b. 381. The first natural was added also in 
