mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 340

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

GE2 (→GE3) removed the rests of the solo piano part. The reason was probably the fact that they had been placed in GE1 clearly after the quaver ending the Tutti – particularly the R.H. may give an impression that the bar contains 5 quavers. The notation of FE does not pose such a threat, and the one of EE even less.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 340-341

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 341

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Fingering digit added to FEH

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 345

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

GE1 (→GE2) is missing the cautionary ​​​​​​​ before b2. It may indicate that the accidental was added only just in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE). The natural was reintroduced in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 345-346

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

GE is missing the dashes marking the range of diminuendo. It is probably an oversight of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE