mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 333

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

EE1 (→EE2) is missing the cautionary  before f​​​​​​​1. The accidental, present in FE (→GE), was added also in EE3. In an analogous situation 2 bars later, a respective  is present in all sources.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Cautionary accidentals

b. 333

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Slur to 2nd g​​​​​​​1 in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Slur to first g​​​​​​​1 in GE3
..

Leading the slur to the 2nd semiquaver of the 2nd half of the bar is most probably an inaccuracy of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2). In the main text, we shorten the slur, since we believe that the slurs over analogous motifs in this and the next phrase should end in the same place.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 333-334

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Slur in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

3 staccato dots in GE3
..

Replacing the g1-g​​​​​​​2 slur with three staccato dots is a totally unjustified arbitrary change of GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 333-335

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No slurs in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Slurs in GE3
..

The slurs over the quavers of the top voice in the L.H. in bars 333 and 335 are an arbitrary addition of GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 334-335

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

e2 repeated in FE (→GE1→GE2)

e2 tied in EE & GE3

Tied e2 suggested by the editors
..

We consider the missing tie of e2 to be a mistake of FE (→GE1→GE2). The tie is in an analogous situation 2 bars earlier, while in the discussed place it is present in the sources of the orchestral part – clarinet I in FEorch (→GEorch) and MFrorch and MFrw.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions