Slurs
b. 120-122
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The added slur in the L.H. is obviously musically justified. However, in the main text we keep the original notation, since Chopin used both notations in similar contexts – with a slur only over the R.H., valid by default also for the L.H., or with separate slurs for both hands. Both EE and GE3 added a slur corresponding to the slur in the R.H. – in EE to the end of bar 121, and in GE3 to e3. The slur in EE begins only just in bar 121 (on a new line); however, its beginning points to continuation from the previous bar. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 124-126
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slur in FE was added probably in the last phase of proofreading; hence it is absent in GE1 (→GE2). It is indicated by the shape of the slur, adjusted to the already existing elements of notation with difficulty. The slur was added in GE3 (also in the L.H.). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 124-126
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 133-137
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Precise slurring of this section (bars 128-143) is a result of Chopin's proofreading, whose traces are visible in FE in bars 133, 136 and 137 – the original slurs reached only just the fourth last semiquaver. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 156-157
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slur added in FED contains a suggestion both in terms of articulation – legato of three subsequent dyads – and in terms of rhythm and phrase due to the emphasis on the quasi-syncopated rhythm of the octaves in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources |