Slurs
|
b. 158-159
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we suggest here a slur modelled after the entry in FED placed two bars earlier. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
|
b. 160-162
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slurs over three subsequent figures in bars 161-162 (in both hands) must be a result of graphic difficulties at the time of writing slurs between the parts of both hands, written on one stave. In EE and GE3, in which each hand was placed on a separate stave, the slurs were added. According to us, the three-bar slur entered in FEH emphasises the difference in articulation and in general character between bars 156-159 and 160-162 and the following ones. In the main text, we do not include that slur, having the nature of a teaching comment. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||
|
b. 163
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 171-175
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slurs of FE must be an inaccuracy of notation – except minor inaccuracies, in the entire theme, both here and in bars 415-449, identical slurs are written in the parts of both hands. Slurs were added both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 178
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add a slur encompassing the characteristic, two-note motif played by violins I. The slur is present in analogous bar 422 as well as in all similar bars – bars 170, 186, 414 and 430. The slur was added also in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
