Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Pitch
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Pitch

b. 91

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

a1 in FE (→GE,EE)

f1 in FEH

..

The variant written in FEH bears all the hallmarks of authenticity – pianistic and harmonic dexterity as well as the smoothness of the transition to the next bar (cf. a similar procedure in the variants added in the Nocturne in D major, op. 27, no. 2, bar 38). The manner of notation is also compliant with similar entries in the copies containing annotations whose Chopinesque origin is confirmed. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FEH

b. 91

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

..

In FE, there are no accidentals before the 4th semiquaver in the R.H. and the bottom note of the 3rd quaver in the L.H. Oversights of the symbols of the current key, typical of Chopin, were corrected both in GE and EE. A sharp in the L.H. was added also in FEH and FES. In the latter, cautionary double sharps before fon the 2nd and 4th beats of the bar were also added.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Annotations in FES , Last key signature sign , Annotations in FEH

b. 92

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

..

In FES there is a  written in before b1 in the chord on the 3rd beat.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Cautionary accidentals , Annotations in FES

b. 93

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

c2 in chord in FE (→EE) & GE3

b1 in GE1 (→GE2)

..

The version of GE1 (→GE2) is most probably erroneous – even if we assumed that Chopin took part in the preparations of GE1, the use of bin this context would have required a cautionary . In GE3, it was considered a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 96

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

f2 in FE (→EE) & GE2 (→GE3)

f2 in GE1

..

Naturally, the version of GE1 is erroneous – cf. all variants of this phrase in bars 47, 49 and 98, where the respective note is never lowered. A sharp was most probably added as part of a routine revision of accidentals – the reviser probably did not recognise the unusual G major key and having considered the fnote in the 1st half of the bar to be a typical alteration of g2, he "corrected" the alleged oversight of its cancellation. The mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions