Pitch
|
b. 86
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The sources differ in the notation of the accidentals in the 2nd half of the bar; however, none of them includes a manifest error. In relation to the notation adopted in the main text (note number in brackets):
Above all, the differences result from different conventions of validity of the marks next to the notes that are included or not included by an octave sign. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|
|
b. 88-90
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|
|
b. 88-90
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , Last key signature sign |
|
|
b. 88-90
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Like in bars 39 and 41, in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), there are accidentals before the 2nd semiquaver in the 2nd half of bars 88 and 90, repeated after the last semiquaver in the 1st half. The superfluous signs were removed in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|
|
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FES, there is a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Cautionary accidentals , Annotations in FES |
before e
2 (1) or a 
before c
2 (11);