b. 102
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The version of GE is almost certainly a Terzverschreibung mistake, probably committed in FE, in which Chopin, however, corrected it in the last phase of proofreading. Taking into account the traces of corrections, a similar mistake was committed and corrected in FE also in the last figure in the previous bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), there is no restoring b2 in the 2nd group of grace notes and no restoring f1 in the last group in the L.H. These harmonically patent oversights of Chopin were corrected only in GE3 and, partially, in the pupils' copies: a was added in FES, a – in FEH. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Annotations in FES , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE , Annotations in FEH |
||||||
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, the missing staccato dots in this bar are to be considered an inaccuracy. The markings were added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In all sources, this is the last bar on a page; in the part of the L.H., at the end of the line, a change of clef to treble should be indicated. However, the sign was added accordingly only in GE3. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions |