mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 98

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FES & FEH

Fingering in EE

No fingering in FE (→GE)
..

The authenticity of the entry in FEH seems to be highly likely in the light of compliance with the fingering of FES written by Chopin. Fontana's fingering in EE defines a different hand position, being a natural continuation of the fingering written over the two previous notes in FED.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH

b. 98

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

..  

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Cautionary accidentals , Annotations in FES

b. 99

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

3 fingering digits in FE (→EE)

2 digits in GE
..

The missing 3rd fingering digit in this bar is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 99

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

..

In GE1 (→GE2), g1 at the beginning bar is an erroneous semiquaver, which was corrected in GE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 100

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH