data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 15-19
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 16-17
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The staccato dots over the octaves in the L.H. is almost certainly a result of Chopin's proofreading in FE (→GE,EE). Cf. bars 20-22. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The dynamic mark is written in Atut between two chords, so that in the majority of the sources it was assigned to the 3rd beat of the bar. According to us, however, the texture clearly indicates that the new dynamics should be valid already from the 1st chord, which is confirmed by the indications in the orchestral parts. Therefore, the notation of Atut is an example of a manner of placing marks within the range of their validity, sometimes used by Chopin. Due to this reason, in the main text we give category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Centrally placed marks |
||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add cautionary naturals before b1 and b2. category imprint: Editorial revisions |