Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 555
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Three subsequent marks are to be understood as long accents – cf. (short) accents in the previous analogous bars. In the main text, we give them such a form, probably consistent with the notation of [A]. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Long accents |
||||||
b. 570
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing wedge over the topmost note is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE, although one cannot exclude a later addition of the mark in the last phase of proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 581
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Omission of the wedge over G is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE3, although one also cannot exclude a revision, motivated, e.g. by the missing staccato mark in similar bar 597. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 585
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the sources, placing an accent under the tied note of the R.H., which deprives the mark of its actual meaning, suggests an inaccuracy in reproducing the Stichvorlage. In the main text, we repeat the notation of the analogous bar of exposition (bar 235) – a long accent over the L.H. part. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 610
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing hairpin is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |