Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 497
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing hairpin is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 514
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we include the wedge added in GE1 (→GE2). Omission of the mark in FE – cf. wedges in the analogous bar of exposition (bar 159) and similar bar 510 and 516 – could have been a result, unintended by Chopin, of proofreading the pitch and rhythmic text of the L.H. in this bar. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 516
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The lack of staccato dot in GE is surely an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 517
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In EE3, the long accent was added most probably after analogous bar 162. In the main text, we generally preserve differentiated indications in exposition and recapitulation, since both sets of indications may be considered to be complete. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 517
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we give the mark the form of a long accent after analogous bar in exposition (bar 162). There is a similar situation in bar 521. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |