|
b. 582
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE), the sharp is placed over the grupetto mark. The patent mistake was corrected in GE by removing the erroneous mark. In the main text, we move the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FEJ , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 583
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) is probably erroneous – cf. analogous bar 232. In the main text, we preserve the nominal rhythmic values of the original version, whereas in GE3 the 1st note was prolonged to a crotchet, which may be considered an alternative reconstruction of the rhythm intended by Chopin. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||||||
|
b. 583
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no reason to doubt the authenticity of the extended version of semiquaver figures given in the edition of the Concerto edited by Mikuli (see bar 153) as a 'Chopinesque variant.' However, it is uncertain whether the egualmente indication and the fingering are also authentic – the fact that, e.g. not all fingerings come from Chopin is openly discussed by Mikuli in the preface to his edition: '[...] the fingering of the edition comes largely from Chopin; wherever this is not the case, it is at least written according to his rules [...].'* * "[...] der Fingersatz dieser Ausgabe grossentheils von Chopin selbst herrührt, wo dies aber nicht der Fall, wenigstens seinen Grundsätzen entsprechend notirt ist [...]" category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 585
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Like in analogous bar 226, the bottom note of the tenth on the 3rd beat of the bar, B, was almost certainly added only just in print, during proofreading. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 585
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the sources, placing an accent under the tied note of the R.H., which deprives the mark of its actual meaning, suggests an inaccuracy in reproducing the Stichvorlage. In the main text, we repeat the notation of the analogous bar of exposition (bar 235) – a long accent over the L.H. part. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
in 
2 as the bottom note of the grupetto seems to be more natural than c2, and the intended mark (
