mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 570

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

​​​​​​​on 2nd beat in FE (→EE)

​​​​​​​on 2nd & 3rd beat in GE
..

The additional ​​​​​​​ must be a mistake of the engraver of GE (perhaps an unfinished correction – following the erroneously printed mark on the 3rd beat of the bar, the correct indication was added, yet the wrong one was not removed.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Partial corrections

b. 570-571

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE
..

Fontana's fingering is identical to the one indicated by Chopin in FED; it is just more accurately written out. In the main text, we include only the undoubtedly authentic entry of the composer. 

category imprint:

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED

b. 570

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Wedge in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE
..

The missing wedge over the topmost note is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE, although one cannot exclude a later addition of the mark in the last phase of proofreading of FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 570

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

GE1 (→GE2) overlooked the demisemiquaver beam in the beam of the 1st group of notes. The mistake was corrected in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 570

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In FE, one can see traces of removal of the third . Chopin most probably reduced the dynamics from  to . Shift of ​​​​​​​ to the beginning of the bar, giving the same image, seems to be much less likely, since the difference in position of the mark before and after proofreading would have been too insignificant to be worth attention.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Authentic corrections of FE