b. 558
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with two subsequent bars points to an inaccurate slur of the majority of the sources. In the main text, we include the correction of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 560
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 560-561
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs of EE are an arbitrary addition of the reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 561
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no raising c3 to c3. The patent mistake was corrected in GE and EE. In turn, the missing restoring g3, necessary in this context, even as a cautionary accidental, was added only in GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 562-563
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The division of the slur, not related in any way to the course of music, must be an inaccuracy. In the main text, we suggest a continuous slur modelled after the slur in analogous bars 211-214. category imprint: Editorial revisions |