data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 555
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Three subsequent category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Long accents |
|||||
b. 555
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 555
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 556
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the version of GE1 (→GE2), the first 4 notes and rest constitute an unmarked semiquaver quintuplet. Nothing points to authenticity of that version, although it is practically very close to the actual performance – see the commentary to the Scherzo in C Like in bar 197, 199 and 201, in FE one can see traces of swapping rhythmic values of the 2nd and 3rd notes – initially, the 2nd note was a semiquaver, whereas the 3rd one – a demisemiquaver. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Inserted rest |
|||||
b. 556-572
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: |