b. 541
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary before the g1 grace note. It was added in EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 541
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 542
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur of FE is a patent oversight. The slur was added both in GE and EE; however, in GE it combines the upper notes of the third, like in analogous bars, whereas in EE – the bottom ones (there was no space for a slur between the upper ones). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 542-543
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The visible traces of changes prove that two identical Terzverschreibung errors were committed in FE – b1 instead of d2 on the last semiquaver of the 2nd beat of each of those bars. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||
b. 543
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1, the first crotchet is a b1-b2 octave. This patent mistake could have been committed in FE, in which, however, Chopin corrected it in the last phase of proofreading. The mistake in GE1 was corrected already in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |