|
b. 430
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The two ones written in FEH in the R.H. differ in font and type of pencil from the fingering in the L.H.; according to us, they could have been added by Chopin. The fingering resulting thereof differs considerably from the fingering added by Fontana in EE. The 1st finger indicated in EE on e1 naturally explains the use of the 4th finger on e2. In turn, it is not that obvious in the fingering indicated in FEH, since the last group of semiquavers offers a few possibilities of fingering – 5234, 5124, but also 5123. In the main text, we include the fingering of FEH, indicated probably by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 430-431
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we extend the slur until the last note of the passage by analogy with bars 426-427. The absence of the slur in GE1 (→GE2) must be a mistake of the engraver; it was added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 431
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there are no accidentals on the 2nd and 3rd beats of the bar, which is a patent inaccuracy. In the remaining editions, a part of the necessary sharps was added; however, none of the editions employed a consistent rule of validity of accidentals for notes appearing in various octaves. In GE1 (→GE2), sharps were added before the 5th, 9th, 10th and 12th semiquavers, which was further developed in GE3 – the accidentals before the 5th and 9th semiquavers were removed and added before the 6th and 8th ones. In EE, 5 sharps were added, omitting only the one before the 6th semiquaver. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 431
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 431
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
This is one of only two places in the entire figurational section of the development (from bar 408) in which a dot was used as a staccato mark at the beginning of the bar, instead of a wedge. According to us, it is almost certainly an inaccuracy of notation. Cf. bar 438. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Wedges |
