mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 426-440

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

category imprint:

b. 427

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

d2 in FE (→GE) & EE2 (→EE3)

f2 in EE1
..

The version of EE1 seems to be a Terzver­schreibung error, revised by removing the , unnecessary next to f2. However, a transfer of the note could have also been intentional, under the influence of bar 431. Anyways, it was already in EE2 (→EE3) that the authentic d2 was restored.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Terzverschreibung error

b. 427

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

The 1st note in GE1 (→GE2) is an erroneous b​​​​​​​3 due to the misplaced octave sign.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 427

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

On the 2nd and 3rd beats of the bar, there are no accidentals in the R.H. in FE; the  raising G to G​​​​​​​ in the L.H. is also missing. In GE1 (→GE2) and EE, a mark was added in the L.H., whereas in the R.H. sharps were added only in the 2nd group of semiquavers, which was most probably considered sufficient due to the notation of that group with the use of an octave sign, hence at the same pitch as the 3rd group. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions

b. 428-429

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur to bar 429 in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Slur in bar 428 in GE3
..

The revision of GE3 does not seem to be justified, since visible traces of changes prove that the slur of FE was proofread, probably by Chopin, whereas both the original and the changed slur reached the 1st sixth in bar 429.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions