|
b. 424
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE), there is no accidental before the 2nd semiquaver. A sharp necessary to achieve c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 424
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE3, the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 424-425
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The shorter slur is a result of an arbitrary action of the reviser of GE3 who probably took into consideration the slur in the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 424-425
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the slur of FE (→GE,EE) is inaccurate, which is proved by the slur in analogous bars 428-429 (most probably proofread by Chopin) as well as by the slurs in the L.H. in both places. The absence of slurs in further part of bar 425 is probably intentional – in analogous bar 429, one can see traces of removal of the slur over the 2nd and 3rd groups of semiquavers in FE. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 425
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The only digit written in FEH (by Chopin?) determines hand position for the entire 1st group of semiquavers; in this situation, it seems natural to repeat this scheme in the next two groups, where the digit determines fingering of the entire bar. It coincides with Fontana's fingering in EE, which is described in more detail. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
1, undoubtedly intended by Chopin in this case, was added in 
raising d1 to d
