Slurs
b. 2-3
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The slur in A ends in a manner that allows for two interpretations. In GE (→FE→EE), that slur was considered to end on the last note of bar 2. In our opinion, it should extend to a flat1 at the beginning of bar 3. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
b. 2-6
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
In EE, slurs were added in the left hand in those bars. This is definitely the editor's revision that was supposed to emphasize that slurring was binding throughout the entire Nocturne. EE also introduced similar revisions in bars 16 & 31. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 4-5
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The extent of the slur is not precisely marked in A. In GE (→FE→EE) the slur was read as ending in bar 4. In our opinion, it is more probable that Chopin intended it to reach the beginning of bar 5 (cf. the remark at the end of bar 2). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
In the sources, bar 7 begins a new line of text; in such situations it is difficult to decide in Chopin's autographs whether the slur is to be treated as a new sign or a continuation of the previous one. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
A carelessly drawn slur in A was interpreted in GE (→FE→EE) as applying only to a group of small notes. In our opinion, it is more probable that Chopin intended a longer slur here. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |