mUltimate Chopin

Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : EE revisions

Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 55

composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major

The slur in A (→GE→FE)
 
..

In EE, the slur in the 2nd half of the bar was shortened, its beginning moved by one semiquaver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 55

composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major

Without accents in A (→GE→FE)

Accents in EE
..

In EE, accents were arbitrarily added at the beginning of the bar and under the first semiquaver of the triplet on the 3rd quaver of the bar. The reason for that revision was probably to make the markings similar to those in analogous bar 15.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 56

composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major

A dynamic mark in EE

Absence of a dynamic mark in A (→GE→FE)
..

An inverted accent (small crescendo mark) visible in EE was added in the proofing of that edition. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 61-62

composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major

A slur in A (→GE→FE)

A slur in EE
..

In EE, the slur reaches the crotchet d flat1 ending the phrase in bar 62. This is, however, not in line with the notation of A (→GE→FE) and has to be considered an arbitrary change made by the reviewer of EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 62

composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major

No slur in A (→GE→FE)

A slur in EE
..

EE has the end of the slur from 61 visible here.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions