|
b. 355-356
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the part of the L.H. these bars are written in A in an abbreviated manner, as repetitions of bar 354. The bars were written in full in GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
|||||
|
b. 356
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The version of GE1 (→FE1) is almost certainly a Terzverschreibung error, which was confirmed by the Chopinesque proofreading of FE2 (→EE) restoring the version of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||
|
b. 356
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Omission of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
|
b. 356-362
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The clearly long accents in A in bars 356, 358 and 362 were inaccurately reproduced in GE (→FE→EE) as short. Cf. bar 360. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
|
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The only long accent in this fragment correctly reproduced in GE1 (→FE) was changed to a short one in EE and GE2. The very idea of unifying the notation of accents in all analogous bars is accurate – all signs in A are the same – yet the accents in A are clearly long, which the reviser of EE could not know, whereas the reviser of GE2 did not consider it to be significant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
2 in 
in 
